DaveT wrote:
No. Admin don't have time and the moderators are used to looking at the world sideways

Taken with an iPoo perhaps? irfanview is a handy (and free) little piece of graphics software. It can convert between just about any image format, resize, rotate etc. etc. I don't think the bulletin board allows changes to images once uploaded so it's always best to check they are what you expect (using something like irfanview/gimp/etc) before upload.

Back onto the planning. Thanks for the photos, I didn't realise it was that easy to get to the adit.
Letter of objection sent today.

Seems the Archaeologist took at face value the identity of the sites as they are determined by "The Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Wales" So I think we can rule out a deliberate misidentification of features by this archaeologist. So on another note, maybe someone should contact "the commission" to inform them of this probable misidentification.

regardless of the identification of such features, surely they indicate that further survey work would be required to investigate the stability of the ground in the area.

I am in the middle of composing an objection complete with a survey, photos etc. and I have left no doubt that the archaeologists they employed have cut loose and fast with the survey and facts. They basically ignored all the stuff which would cause a big problem and I don't think this was accidental. I suspect the people conducting the review will take a very dim view of this.

Dave